ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
VEA-SegUNet: Edge-Enhanced Multi-Scale Network with F2-Optimization for Robust Coronary Artery Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) requires precise vessel segmentation in coronary angiography. However, challenges such as low contrast, imaging artifacts, and vessel overlap often result in segmentation discontinuities and hinder the identification of small vessels. To overcome these issues, we propose VEA-SegUNet, a novel vessel segmentation method for X-ray coronary angiography. Our approach incorporates three key innovations. First, the vessel enhancement module (VEA) leverages unsupervised edge detection priors to emphasize vessel boundaries. Second, a multi-scale deformable convolutional attention module is embedded within the U-Net encoder to capture complex vascular structures at different scales, thereby improving vessel continuity and small vessel detection. Third, F2-score optimization prioritizes vessel connectivity in segmentation topology. We validate the F2-score as a superior metric to the traditional F1-score for coronary segmentation and incorporate F2 loss into the framework. Extensive experiments on the DCA1, CHUAC, and XCA datasets demonstrate that VEA-SegUNet outperforms six state-of-the-art U-shaped architectures on several metrics. It achieves an F1-score of 79.1%, an F2-score of 85.1%, a recall of 89.3%, an IoU of 65.1%, an accuracy of 97.7%, and an AUC of 98.8%, while maintaining a very competitive computational efficiency. These results confirm the effectiveness and practicality of VEA-SegUNet for coronary artery segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41917240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.