ArticleScientific reports2026
PlantCLR: contrastive self-supervised pretraining for generalizable plant disease detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SwiftMSeg: lightweight multi-scale local-global context modeling with transformer for medical image segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning has improved automated plant disease detection by increasing recognition accuracy and robustness compared with traditional vision-based methods. Self-supervised learning (SSL) further reduces dependence on manual labels, but its transferability across heterogeneous agricultural datasets remains insufficiently characterized. Here, we evaluate a contrastive SSL pretraining and fine-tuning pipeline, termed PlantCLR, for plant disease classification under cross-dataset transfer with target-domain fine-tuning. PlantCLR combines SimCLR-style contrastive pretraining with a lightweight convolutional classifier to balance representation quality and deployment efficiency. Experiments on PlantVillage and Cassava Leaf Disease show strong performance, achieving 99.10% accuracy and 99.04% F1-score on PlantVillage, and 96.83% accuracy and 96.70% F1-score on Cassava. Feature embedding visualization using t-SNE and explanation maps using Grad-CAM indicate improved class separability and attention to disease-relevant regions. These results suggest that contrastive SSL can improve representation transfer while maintaining computational efficiency, supporting scalable plant disease diagnostics in practical agricultural settings. Code is available at GitHub .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.