Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917218›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2026

Unclassified Inborn Errors of Immunity Patients without any Pathogenic Variant in Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing: Long-Term Follow-up and Whole Exome Sequencing Results.

Ilke Bas, Ezgi Topyildiz, Emine Ulgen, Pinar Sahin, Gamze Tokgoz Erdis, Asude Durmaz, Neslihan Edeer Karaca, Guzide Aksu, Ayca Aykut, Necil Kutukculer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ilke Bas *Department of Pediatric Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye. ilke.bas@ege.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2849-5215
Ezgi Topyildiz *Department of Pediatric Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9260-8157
Emine UlgenDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2342-3677
Pinar SahinDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-7383
Gamze Tokgoz ErdisDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8084-6430
Asude DurmazDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4109-9401
Neslihan Edeer KaracaDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-7082
Guzide AksuDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2714-0903
Ayca AykutDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-0053
Necil KutukculerDepartment of Pediatric Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9196-3819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this eight-year study, children with unclassified inborn errors of immunity (IEI) who have no pathogenic variants in targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) were re-evaluated by using singleton whole exome sequencing (sWES) and followed-up at least five years. They were also investigated if they had affected family members or not. In addition, all patients had detailed immunological and clinical work-up.

methodsIn 2017, 108 children with probable diagnosis of IEI had tNGS and pathogenic variants were detected in 38 (35.1%) patients who were not included into the study. The rest 70 patients were continued to be immunologicaly followed-up (67.0 ± 19.7 months) and 15 of them (21.4%) recovered spontaneously. Fifty-five patients were divided into two groups; (i) familial patients (n = 30); (ii) non-familial patients (n = 25). In all of them, sWES analysis was performed.

resultsThere were 19 affected fathers, 9 mothers and 16 siblings whereas consanguinity rate for parents was 8.5%. In sWES analysis, no genetic alterations were detected in 28 (50.9%) patients and 14 cases showed predefined pathogenic variants which are not associated with IEI. Probable IEI causing variants were found in 13 of 55 cases. However, after genotype/phenotype examinations and segregation analysis by sanger sequencing for their parents, we were able to define only three pathogenic variants in three cases, namely two for IKBKB gene and one for PRKDC in familial cases. Fifty-five cases were screened with sWES and only three pathogenic variants were revealed (3/55, 5.45%). When we add this result to tNGS finding (35.1%), all together 40.55% of unclassifed IEI cases could be defined by both of these genetic investigations.

conclusionEven with NGS-based approaches improving IEI diagnoses, detection rates still remain below 50%. Whole genome sequencing in the near future would offer the advantage of much more comprehensive and accurate variant detections.

Indexed as

ImmunityChildChild, PreschoolExome SequencingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInfantMaleMutationTargeted next-generation sequencingUnclassified inborn errors of immunityUnclassified primary antibody deficiencyWhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41917218
PMCPMC13160999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.