ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
IPSS-M downstaging before transplantation does not improve the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hypomethylating agents are the current therapy backbone for MDS and AML relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (ASCT) is the only curative option for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but whether cytoreductive pretreatment and molecular "downstaging" according to the IPSS-M improves outcomes remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 128 consecutive adults with MDS who underwent ASCT grouped as frontline transplantation (n = 87) or pretreated before transplant (n = 41). Median bone marrow blasts at diagnosis were 12% vs. 10%. IPSS-M was calculated at diagnosis and immediately before transplant using cytogenetic and next-generation sequencing data. IPSS-M improved in 26% of frontline and 34% of pretreated patients, was unchanged in 41% and 34%, and worsened in 30% and 32%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17.3 months, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and graft-versus-host disease relapse-free survival (GRFS) were superior with frontline transplantation (median OS 112.6 vs 14.0 months, p = 0.03, median RFS 61.0 vs 8.9 months, p = 0.007 and median GRFS 13.3 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.004). However, in a landmark analysis starting at the time of transplantation, the difference in OS was no longer statistically significant. Non-relapse mortality was significantly higher after pretreatment (p = 0.018). Pretransplant cytoreduction did not improve post-transplant outcomes despite modest IPSS-M improvements, supporting molecular-risk-guided timing and early donor identification rather than treatment aimed at IPSS-M downstaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.