Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917165›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Structured taxonomy and framework for developing medical benchmark in large language models derived from scoping review.

Junbok Lee, Jaeyong Shin, Belong Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junbok LeeYonsei Institute for Digital Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaeyong ShinDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. drshin@yuhs.ac.
Belong ChoDepartment of Human Systems Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. belong@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of large language model technology, numerous studies have explored its application in the medical field. Robust evaluation is crucial for ensuring reliability and safety, leading to the development of diverse benchmark datasets. In this study, we propose a structured taxonomy to provide researchers with practical guidance for benchmark selection. Furthermore, we introduce READY, a development framework built on five principles - Reliable, Ethical, Annotated, Diverse, Yield-validated - to support the systematic design of medical benchmarks and strengthen future evaluation practices. To establish the taxonomy and framework, we systematically reviewed benchmark datasets designed for evaluating LLMs in medical context. A comprehensive literature search yielded 55 relevant studies. Each benchmark was analyzed using a structured framework encompassing the dataset construction and evaluation methodology. To assess the applicability of the proposed framework, five domain experts independently applied the READY framework to benchmark studies, demonstrating consistent inter-rater agreement. We anticipate that this research will promote more rigorous and ethical LLM evaluation, paving the way for the safe application of LLMs in clinical settings.

Identifiers

PMID41917165
PMCPMC13376798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.