ArticleScientific reports2026
Graph transformer Q-network for collaborative governance and decentralized decision-making in multi-intersection networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coordinated traffic signal control along urban corridors is critical for reducing stop-and-go waves, vehicle delay, and queue spillback, yet remains challenging under large-scale topology, partial observability, and stochastic demand. Existing MARL controllers often rely on dense or static inter-intersection communication and locally scoped rewards, which weakens corridor-level credit assignment and leads to attention diffusion and unstable coordination as network scale grows. We propose the Graph Transformer Q-Network (GTQN) that learns a state-dependent sparse interaction graph for coordination and couples it with centralized governance during training so that decentralized controllers can reliably form and sustain corridor progression. Concretely, GTQN (i) learns which upstream/downstream peers are causally influential at each decision step via a two-stage mechanism (discrete peer gating followed by soft relevance weighting), yielding sparse, interpretable coordination without attention diffusion; (ii) uses a unified graph-transformer backbone to jointly encode network topology and temporal history so delayed upstream-to-downstream effects that determine green-wave formation are represented within the value function; and (iii) introduces a Collaborative Governance Graph (CTDE) trained with a progression-oriented two-level reward that couples junction efficiency with a corridor hindrance penalty, improving credit assignment and learning stability. Experiments on synthetic and real-world urban networks, including a 100-intersection Chengdu network, show that GTQN consistently improves progression quality, achieving the lowest Average Number of Stops (e.g., ANS [Formula: see text] on SQ1 and [Formula: see text] on SQ3) while reducing waiting time and queues and increasing throughput. Ablations confirm that learned sparsity, unified spatiotemporal encoding, and centralized governance are each necessary for scalable and progression-aware coordination. Robustness study demonstrates that GTQN maintains acceptable performance under moderate communication perturbations such as message dropout and delays. Code for this study is archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18885573 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.