ArticleNature medicine2026
A deep joint-learning proteomics model for diagnosis of six conditions associated with dementia.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust Longitudinal Dementia Prediction under Systemic Missingness via Hierarchical Fusion and Test-Time Adaptation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Engineering in vivo CAR-T cells.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Co-pathology is a common feature of neurodegenerative diseases that complicates diagnosis, treatment and clinical management. However, sensitive, specific and scalable biomarkers for in vivo pathological diagnosis are not available for most neurodegenerative neuropathologies. Here we present Proteomics-based Artificial Intelligence for Dementia Diagnosis (ProtAIDe-Dx), a deep joint-learning model on 17,187 patients and controls (age of 70.3 ± 11.5 years, 53.2% female), that uses plasma proteomics to provide simultaneous probabilistic diagnosis across 6 conditions associated with dementia in aging. ProtAIDe-Dx achieves cross-validated balanced classification accuracy of 70-95% and area under the curve of >78% across all conditions. The model's diagnostic probabilities highlighted subgroups of patients with co-pathologies and were associated with pathology-specific biomarkers in an external memory clinic sample, even among individuals without cognitive impairment. Model interpretation revealed a suite of protein networks marking shared and specific biological processes across diseases and identified novel and previously described proteins discriminating each diagnosis. ProtAIDe-Dx significantly improved biomarker-based differential diagnosis in a memory clinic sample, pinpointing proteins leading to diagnostic decisions at an individual level. Together, this work highlights the promise of plasma proteomics to improve patient-level diagnostic workup with a single blood draw.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.