Trial reportScientific reports2026
Intramyometrial injection versus intravenous infusion of oxytocin for maintaining uterine contractility during elective caesarean delivery in a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oxytocin is commonly administered during caesarean delivery (CD) to prevent postpartum haemorrhage as an initial bolus followed by a maintenance dose. Nearly half of perinatal centres in Japan utilise intramyometrial (IMY) oxytocin. IMY oxytocin is less effective than intravenous (IV) oxytocin as the initial dose for inducing uterine contractions. However, its role as a maintenance dose remains unclear. We evaluated the efficacy of IMY oxytocin versus continuous IV infusion for maintaining uterine contractility during elective CD. Twenty-two women undergoing elective CD were randomised to receive an initial IV bolus of 1 IU of oxytocin, followed by either 5 IU IMY oxytocin or a continuous IV infusion of 5 IU oxytocin. Total blood loss, along with haemodynamic parameters, was assessed. No significant difference in total blood loss was observed between the IMY and IV groups (median 634 mL [540-718] vs. 642 mL [507.5-706.5], P = 0.66). Conversely, IMY oxytocin resulted in smaller reductions in blood pressure and lower phenylephrine requirements after delivery. While IMY oxytocin did not significantly reduce total blood loss compared with continuous IV infusion, it was associated with better haemodynamic stability. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.Clinical trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs041210153, 25/04/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.