ArticleScientific reports2026
Prompt engineering competence, knowledge management, and technology fit as drivers of educational sustainability through generative AI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of prompt engineering competence, knowledge management, and task-individual-technology fit on the continued intention to use artificial intelligence (AI), as well as their implications for educational sustainability. Data from 437 undergraduate students who use AI tools for academic purposes were analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results indicated that prompt engineering competence significantly predicts knowledge acquisition and knowledge application, which, in turn, significantly predict both task-technology fit (TTF) and individual-technology fit (ITF). Furthermore, TTF and ITF were found to have significant impacts on the continuous intention, which, in turn, positively predicts educational sustainability through generative AI. The results of the multi-group analysis revealed that the hypotheses were supported in both the female and male samples and that the model maintained a consistent and robust structure across genders. Overall, the findings provide substantial evidence on how generative AI supports sustainable learning in education by developing prompt engineering skills, promoting effective knowledge management practices, and ensuring technology alignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.