ArticleScientific reports2026
Multimodal contrastive prognostication framework for early neurological outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains a critical public health challenge with mortality rates close to 90%. Current prognostication methods commonly analyze data of individual modalities separately and delay assessment until 72 hours post-arrest, creating a critical gap in early decision-making. Here, we introduce contrastive language and image reasoning with masked autoencoders (CLAIR), a novel multimodal framework integrating head computed tomography (CT) imaging with non-imaging clinical patient information through a cross-attention mechanism and contrastive learning approach to predict cerebral performance category (CPC) score in patients after cardiac arrest. In a retrospective study of 208 patients, we evaluated CLAIR against CT-based imaging-only assessment, as well as clinical evaluation by two experienced ICU neurologists. Our method achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.94 (CI: 0.90-0.97) when trained on a combination of multiplanar CT reconstructions and non-imaging clinical data, significantly outperforming CT scan-based imaging-only methods (AUC-ROC: 0.80, CI: 0.74-0.86) with statistical significance (p = 0.03). In a structured evaluation, the clinicians suggested that CLAIR assisted assessments resulted in fewer prognostic errors than non-assisted evaluations. Further, we demonstrate the applicability of our approach for early neurologic outcome prediction using CT scans obtained within the first 24 hours post-arrest (median acquisition time: 3.1 hours). Our results suggest that CLAIR can contribute value as a clinical assistive tool aiming at reliable early prognostication for post-cardiac arrest patients, potentially enabling more timely clinical decision-making, family counseling, and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.