ArticleScientific reports2026
Visual awareness of stimulus features shapes motor control through action end-state comfort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Within the dorsal stream account of visuomotor control, the role of visual awareness in guiding action remains controversial. We argue that addressing this question requires considering how action demands influence the processing of task-relevant visual information. Accordingly, we conducted two experiments in which participants performed a reaching movement to match their hand orientation to that of a briefly presented Gabor patch. Action biomechanical demands were modulated by varying the end-state comfort of hand rotations (i.e., amplitudes and directions). Experiment 1 tested clockwise rotations at small and large amplitudes, whereas Experiment 2 included both clockwise and counterclockwise rotations, each at two amplitudes. Visual awareness was manipulated by presenting Gabor orientations at the perceptual threshold, enabling comparisons of performance between aware and unaware trials. We analysed three parameters indexing distinct aspects of the action's underlying processes: hand rotation accuracy, rotation onset, and rotation smoothness. We found that visual information not consciously available could partially guide movement selection, but only when the movement was comfortable. Conversely, visual awareness was critical for uncomfortable movements, as performance dropped substantially when orientations were not consciously perceived. In addition, visual awareness produced different effects across phases of movement control: facilitated movement preparation (higher accuracy, earlier onset) but restrained execution (reduced smoothness). Our findings offer new insights into perception-action coupling and help clarify conflicting results in the literature concerning the role of visual awareness in motor control: whether visual awareness is necessary for motor control may depend on the biomechanical demands of the planned action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.