ArticleScientific reports2026
An efficient uncertainty integrated aggregation scheme for water quality detection and longitudinal carbon offset estimation in the Yamuna River.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
River water quality deterioration caused by industrialization and urbanization not only threatens public health but also weakens ecosystem services such as carbon assimilation. Conventional water quality indices and deterministic assessment models inadequately represent the heterogeneous and uncertain nature of hydrochemical and microbial monitoring data, particularly in complex river systems like the Yamuna. This study aims to develop an uncertainty-aware framework for (i) reliable detection of water quality degradation hotspots and (ii) quantitative estimation of longitudinal carbon offset capacity along the Yamuna River by explicitly modeling measurement indeterminacy and nonlinear pollution effects. An ellipsoidal single-valued neutrosophic modeling structure is introduced to represent directional and anisotropic uncertainty in physicochemical and microbial parameters. Two trigonometric aggregation operators—ellipsoidal single-valued neutrosophic trigonometric weighted averaging (E-SvNVTWA) and weighted geometric (E-SvNVTWG)—are formulated to capture overall ecological condition and extreme pollution sensitivity, respectively. Neutrosophic efficiency indices derived from 25 CPCB monitoring stations are further linked to a normalized carbon offset estimation model to evaluate ecosystem service potential. The dual-operator framework reveals a pronounced upstream–downstream gradient in ecological condition. Upstream stations (e.g., Dehradun, Hanumanchatti) exhibit high neutrosophic efficiency (> 0.9) and higher relative ecological processing efficiency, while downstream industrial stretches (e.g., Hasanpur, Mohena Palwal) show sharp efficiency decline and near-zero TWG values, indicating ecological functional stress. The TWG operator demonstrates enhanced sensitivity to severe organic and microbial pollution, effectively identifying critical degradation hotspots. The proposed ellipsoidal neutrosophic dual-aggregation model provides a structured uncertainty-aware decision-support framework that integrates uncertainty modeling, nonlinear pollution response, and ecosystem service evaluation. By linking water quality diagnostics with carbon offset potential, the framework advances climate-relevant river basin assessment and supports sustainability-oriented management of heavily stressed river systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.