Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917053›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Bidirectional yet asymmetric causality between urban systems and traffic dynamics in 30 cities worldwide.

Yatao Zhang, Ye Hong, Song Gao, Martin Raubal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yatao ZhangFuture Resilient Systems, Singapore-ETH Centre, ETH Zurich, Singapore, Singapore. yatzhang@ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5701-2836
Ye HongInstitute of Cartography and Geoinformation, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8996-3748
Song GaoGeospatial Data Science Lab, Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4359-6302
Martin RaubalFuture Resilient Systems, Singapore-ETH Centre, ETH Zurich, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5951-6835

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how urban systems and traffic dynamics co-evolve is crucial for advancing sustainable and resilient cities. However, their bidirectional causal relationships remain underexplored due to challenges of simultaneously inferring spatial heterogeneity, temporal variation, and feedback mechanisms. Here we present a spatio-temporal causality framework that bridges correlation and causation by integrating spatio-temporal weighted regression with spatio-temporal convergent cross-mapping. Characterizing cities through urban structure, form, and function, the framework uncovers bidirectional causal patterns between urban systems and traffic dynamics across 30 cities on six continents. Our findings reveal asymmetric bidirectional causality, with urban systems exerting stronger influences on traffic dynamics than the reverse in most cities. Urban form and function shape mobility more profoundly than structure, even though structure often exhibits higher correlations. This does not preclude the reversed causal direction, whereby long-established mobility patterns can also reshape the built environment over time. Finally, we identify three causal archetypes: tightly coupled, pattern-heterogeneous, and workday-attenuated, which support city-to-city learning and inform context-sensitive strategies in sustainable urban and transport planning.

Identifiers

PMID41917053
PMCPMC13201568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.