Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917048›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

Batch Distillation Data for Developing Machine Learning Anomaly Detection Methods.

Justus Arweiler, Indra Jungjohann, Aparna Muraleedharan, Heike Leitte, Jakob Burger, Kerstin Münnemann, Fabian Jirasek, Hans Hasse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Justus ArweilerLaboratory of Engineering Thermodynamics, RPTU Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße 44, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2222-0755
Indra JungjohannLaboratory of Engineering Thermodynamics, RPTU Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße 44, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7934-3542
Aparna MuraleedharanTechnical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Laboratory for Chemical Process Engineering, Uferstraße 53, 94315, Straubing, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7232-1550
Heike LeitteDepartment of Computer Science, RPTU Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße 44, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7112-2190
Jakob BurgerTechnical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Laboratory for Chemical Process Engineering, Uferstraße 53, 94315, Straubing, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2583-2335
Kerstin MünnemannLaboratory of Engineering Thermodynamics, RPTU Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße 44, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-8856
Fabian JirasekLaboratory of Engineering Thermodynamics, RPTU Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße 44, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany. fabian.jirasek@rptu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2502-5701
Hans HasseLaboratory of Engineering Thermodynamics, RPTU Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße 44, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4612-5995

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 459419731Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 537627671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) holds great potential to advance anomaly detection (AD) in chemical processes. However, the development of ML-based methods is hindered by the lack of openly available experimental data. To address this gap, we have set up a laboratory-scale batch distillation plant and operated it to generate an extensive experimental dataset, covering fault-free experiments and experiments in which anomalies were intentionally induced, for training advanced ML-based AD methods. In total, 119 experiments were conducted across a wide range of operating conditions and mixtures. Most experiments containing anomalies were paired with a corresponding fault-free one. The dataset that we provide here includes time-series data from numerous sensors and actuators, along with estimates of measurement uncertainty. In addition, unconventional data sources - such as concentration profiles obtained via online benchtop NMR spectroscopy and video and audio recordings - are provided. Extensive metadata and expert annotations of all experiments are included. The anomaly annotations are based on an ontology developed in this work. The data are organized in a structured dataset and made freely available via https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17395543 . This new dataset paves the way for the development of advanced ML-based AD methods. As it includes information on the causes of anomalies, it further enables the development of interpretable and explainable ML approaches, as well as methods for anomaly mitigation.

Identifiers

PMID41917048
PMCPMC13044305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.