ArticleScientific reports2026
Interaction of two parenchyma ray types regulates redwood heartwood deposition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Part of the longevity strategy of trees is the deposition of extractives, biocidal compounds within heartwood that slow decay long after tree death and are thus an important determinant of carbon residency time. The process of heartwood deposition is regulated by parenchyma rays, living tissues that store carbohydrates, are the sites of biosynthesis, and contain substantial quantities of extractives within mature heartwood. We sought to explore and predict heartwood deposition across the full axial gradient in Sequoia sempervirens by incorporating the plasticity of sapwood parenchyma rays into our models and testing the value of separating them into two size classes. We used synchrotron-based X-ray tomographic microscopy (microCT) for anatomical measurements and novel tissue-level densitometry of wood samples collected from up to 100 m above ground. We found that Sequoia has two distinct ray types, and the interaction of these short and tall rays strongly predicts variation in the extractive content of heartwood. Environmental context was crucial; separate anatomy-based models were needed for never-logged primary and recovering secondary Sequoia forests in the north and primary forests on the southern margin of the species’ range. Incorporating ray structure and distribution into future work on heartwood extractives could provide tools to quantify and monitor heartwood responses of Sequoia forests to management and climate based on the phenotypic plasticity of rays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.