Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41916988›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Disentangling the Janus-faced effects of cations in electrocatalysis.

Xinwei Zhu, Tobias Binninger, Marc T M Koper, Michael Eikerling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinwei ZhuTheory and Computation of Energy Materials (IET-3), Institute of Energy Technologies, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany. x.zhu.electrochem@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4636-8893
Tobias BinningerTheory and Computation of Energy Materials (IET-3), Institute of Energy Technologies, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-0501
Marc T M KoperLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michael EikerlingTheory and Computation of Energy Materials (IET-3), Institute of Energy Technologies, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany. m.eikerling@fz-juelich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0764-8948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cation identity and concentration strongly influence electrocatalytic processes, yet their effects remain insufficiently understood. Taking hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline media as a model system, variations in cation concentration induce complex, sometimes inverted, activity trends. Increasing cation concentration can either promote or inhibit electrocatalytic activity depending on cation identity, electrode material and solution pH. These Janus-faced effects of cations challenge the current understandings of cation effects in electrocatalysis, which typically emphasize either promotional or inhibitory roles. Here, we propose a mechanistic rationale for the promoter-inhibitor transitions of cation effects and identify cation position in the electric double layer as the key factor governing this behavior. The theoretical framework distinguishes two cation states: cations electrostatically attracted in the diffuse layer, or cations specifically adsorbed at the inner Helmholtz plane. Incorporating the electric field effect on water dissociation beyond the Frumkin corrections, we show that the two cation states modulate the local electric field and thus kinetics in opposite ways. The observed inversions result from their competition, governed by cation size and adsorption strength. The framework and insights will be relevant to other electrocatalytic reactions at strongly negatively charged surfaces, such as CO

Identifiers

PMID41916988
PMCPMC13043930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.