ArticleBlood cancer journal2026
Clinical outcomes and risk factors of cytomegalovirus reactivation in teclistamab-treated multiple myeloma patients.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Infectious toxicities associated with bispecific antibodies and CAR-T Cells in multiple myeloma: a systematic review.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teclistamab, a bispecific T-cell engager targeting BCMA and CD3, has demonstrated efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma but may increase infection risk due to immunosuppression. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a concern in immunocompromised patients, yet its incidence and clinical significance in teclistamab-treated patients remain poorly characterized. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 177 multiple myeloma patients who received teclistamab between December 2022 and December 2024. We assessed CMV reactivation incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. Binary logistic regression identified predictors of CMV reactivation. CMV testing was done in 173 (98%) patients. CMV reactivation occurred in 38 patients (22%) during teclistamab treatment, with a median initial viral load of 87.2 IU/mL (range: 37.1-4807.0). The median highest CMV level was 288 IU/mL (range: 45.3-20,000). Most reactivations were asymptomatic (89.5%), with only four symptomatic cases, three requiring treatment, and no end-organ damage. Eight patients (21.1%) experienced second viremia episodes. Multivariable analysis identified prior CMV reactivation as a significant predictor (OR = 3.34, p = 0.005). CMV reactivation did not impact overall survival (p = 0.673). Prophylactic IVIG use was associated with improved survival (HR = 0.49, p = 0.011). CMV reactivation occurs in approximately one-fifth of teclistamab-treated multiple myeloma patients but is typically asymptomatic and does not affect survival. Prior CMV reactivation predicts subsequent reactivation. These findings support risk-stratified CMV monitoring approaches in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.