ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2026
[Chinese Expert Consensus on Clinical Management of Oncogene Addicted Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Leptomeningeal Metastasis (2026 Edition)].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction in the Treatment of Pemetrexed Intrathecal Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity in NSCLC Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastases: A Randomized Controlled Trial].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Trial
- [Research Progress on Circulating Tumor DNA Status and Postoperative Central Nervous System Recurrence Risk and Overall Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Intrathecal chemotherapy for leptomeningeal metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is extremely poor. However, in oncogene addicted patients, the emergence of targeted therapies with high central nervous system (CNS) penetration is significantly reshaping the treatment landscape. Existing guidelines, which often favor conservative strategies, are no longer sufficient to meet the demands of precision medicine. To address this challenge, the Metastasis Lung Cancer Collaboration Group, Youth Specialists Committee of Beijing Medical Reward Foundation convened multidisciplinary experts from Medical Oncology, Radiology, Pathology, Radiotherapy, and Neurosurgery. Based on evidence-based medicine from the past decade and clinical practice experience, they have developed the Chinese expert consensus on clinical management of oncogene addicted NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastasis (2026 edition). This consensus emphasizes that the diagnosis of LM should be based on a comprehensive assessment of clinical symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. It also highlights the critical role of CSF molecular liquid biopsy in clarifying driver gene status and assessing treatment efficacy. In terms of treatment, this consensus advocates for a fundamental paradigm shift: therapy should be led by a multidisciplinary team (MDT), with high-CNS-penetration targeted therapies as the first-line intervention, while local treatments (such as intrathecal injection and radiotherapy) are positioned as supplementary measures. The consensus provides a series of expert recommendations on key aspects, including the selection of high-CNS-penetration tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the application of intrathecal chemotherapy, the timing of radiotherapy, and palliative surgery. It aims to establish proactive, individualized treatment standards for patients with NSCLC LM in China, based on molecular subtyping and MDT collaboration, thereby improving patient survival outcomes. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.