ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Beyond the report: a qualitative exploration of safety incidents in maternity services.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaternal and neonatal mortality in the UK remains high, underscoring safety concerns in maternity care. Incident reporting remains a key mechanism for identifying risks and driving improvement, yet challenges, including underreporting and limited organisational learning, persist.
aimThe primary aim of the study was to explore clinicians' preferences and behaviours in maternity patient safety reporting within a tertiary hospital.
methodsWe conducted a two-phase qualitative study in a UK tertiary teaching hospital maternity service. Phase 1 involved AI-supported Big Qualitative (Big Qual) thematic analysis (using Caplena and Infranodus) of the first 400 patient safety incident reports submitted via the local electronic reporting system over a 5-month period (June-November 2024). Phase 2 comprised semistructured interviews with 14 maternity clinicians conducted between April and June 2025 and informed by phase 1 findings. Interview data were analysed using a Rapid Assessment Procedure and framework-based thematic analysis. Findings from both phases were integrated at the interpretation stage to examine reporting practices, barriers and enablers and opportunities for organisational learning, drawing on sociotechnical systems and safety-II-informed concepts.
resultsThematic analysis of incident reports identified ten recurrent topics including staffing capacity, documentation discrepancies and communication issues. Interviews highlighted barriers such as psychological safety, form complexity and limited feedback, alongside enablers including visible learning and supportive leadership. Inconsistencies in reporting behaviours, feedback mechanisms and system integration were evident, with underreporting of near misses and staff conduct identified as key gaps.
conclusionsThis study offers a nuanced view on how incident reporting is enacted in practice within maternity care. By combining interview data with Big Qual incident analysis, it identifies actionable insights for improving safety and organisational learning. Recommendations include simplifying reporting systems, embedding psychological safety, standardising processes and enhancing feedback and cross-professional learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.