ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Improving ward round documentation using the
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transforming surgical ward rounds: constructivist pedagogy, structured models, and intelligent technologies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate and timely documentation during surgical ward rounds is critical for ensuring patient safety, effective multidisciplinary communication and continuity of care. In high-demand surgical settings, resident doctors often experience delays in completing documentation due to competing clinical priorities. This quality improvement project aimed to assess whether an artificial intelligence (AI) transcription tool,
methodsBaseline data on time taken to complete conventional ward round documentation were collected over a 4-day period. The
resultsThe implementation of
conclusionsUsing AI tools can not only improve timeliness of clinical records but also free resident doctors from scribing duties, allowing greater participation in patient care and enhancing educational opportunities. This intervention demonstrated the potential of AI-assisted documentation to improve workflow efficiency and patient flow while supporting resident doctor training and reducing administrative burden in a surgical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.