Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41916738›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2026

Development of national competence areas and competence goals for patient safety using a modified Delphi method.

Maria Unbeck, Anna Dahlgren, Christian Danielsson, Karin Pukk Harenstam, Helena Walfridsson, Mirjam Ekstedt, Axel Ros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria UnbeckSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5090-0352
Anna DahlgrenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8252-3961
Christian DanielssonNational Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin Pukk HarenstamAstrid Lindgren's Children's Hospital, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helena WalfridssonNational Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mirjam EkstedtFaculty of Life and Health Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4108-391X
Axel RosSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Jonkoping County, Sweden axel.ros@ju.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-8068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe WHO calls for integrating patient safety curricula in healthcare education globally, but the limited contextual applicability of existing frameworks constrains national implementation. This work aims to describe the development of Swedish national competence goals in patient safety to establish patient safety as a distinct field summarised within a comprehensive framework of competency areas.

methodThe national competence goals were developed in a project initiated by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare that commissioned a group of academics with expertise in patient safety to work on the project. The development entailed an iterative process involving both physical and digital meetings, individual work and two rounds of questionnaires. Initially, drawing on expert knowledge and international literature, a set of competence areas based on key concepts in patient safety was proposed and defined. Within each competence area, several competence goals were developed. A modified Delphi process was then employed to collect insights from two multidisciplinary panels of experts (n=23). Finally, competence areas, key concepts and competence goals were refined based on feedback from the two Delphi panels.

resultsThe project resulted in a national framework comprising 15 competence areas and 113 competence goals, highlighting key dimensions of patient safety such as foundational concepts, professional roles, systems thinking, patient involvement, human factors, communication and teamwork, organisational culture, risk awareness, learning from adverse events, evaluation, safe practices, technology, leadership, emergency preparedness and high-risk care situations.

conclusionsThe development of national competence areas and goals marks an advancement in establishing patient safety as a distinct scientific discipline, where they collectively provide a broad and structured set of educational goals and standards. This initiative provides a foundation for integrating patient safety curricula into national healthcare education and strengthening patient safety practices, which can serve as an inspiration to others.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceGoalsPatient SafetyDelphi TechniqueHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenContinuing education, continuing professional developmentHealth professions educationPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID41916738
PMCPMC13052552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.