ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Development of national competence areas and competence goals for patient safety using a modified Delphi method.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe WHO calls for integrating patient safety curricula in healthcare education globally, but the limited contextual applicability of existing frameworks constrains national implementation. This work aims to describe the development of Swedish national competence goals in patient safety to establish patient safety as a distinct field summarised within a comprehensive framework of competency areas.
methodThe national competence goals were developed in a project initiated by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare that commissioned a group of academics with expertise in patient safety to work on the project. The development entailed an iterative process involving both physical and digital meetings, individual work and two rounds of questionnaires. Initially, drawing on expert knowledge and international literature, a set of competence areas based on key concepts in patient safety was proposed and defined. Within each competence area, several competence goals were developed. A modified Delphi process was then employed to collect insights from two multidisciplinary panels of experts (n=23). Finally, competence areas, key concepts and competence goals were refined based on feedback from the two Delphi panels.
resultsThe project resulted in a national framework comprising 15 competence areas and 113 competence goals, highlighting key dimensions of patient safety such as foundational concepts, professional roles, systems thinking, patient involvement, human factors, communication and teamwork, organisational culture, risk awareness, learning from adverse events, evaluation, safe practices, technology, leadership, emergency preparedness and high-risk care situations.
conclusionsThe development of national competence areas and goals marks an advancement in establishing patient safety as a distinct scientific discipline, where they collectively provide a broad and structured set of educational goals and standards. This initiative provides a foundation for integrating patient safety curricula into national healthcare education and strengthening patient safety practices, which can serve as an inspiration to others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.