SynthesisCancer medicine2026
Exercise Preferences, Barriers, Motivators, Facilitators, and Perceived Benefits in Adults With Brain Tumours-A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdults with brain tumours face a poor prognosis, and physical and mental impairments reduce quality of life. Exercise can improve outcomes for this population; however, uptake and adherence remain low. Understanding exercise preferences, barriers, motivators, facilitators, and perceived benefits is crucial to optimising engagement.
methodsA systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, and the Nursing and Allied Health Database (2015-2025) was conducted. Studies were eligible if they included adults (≥ 18 years) with brain tumours and reported original qualitative or quantitative data. Screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, 2018 version) were performed by two authors, with discrepancies resolved by a third. Data were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneity.
resultsSeven studies involving 163 participants were included, with mean ages of 48-63.5 years and 44.8% males. Most studies included individuals diagnosed with glioblastoma, glioma, or oligodendroglioma. Exercise preferences were reported in 5/7 studies. Participants preferred flexible, individualised exercise programs with varied delivery modes and session durations. Walking was the most commonly preferred activity in 2/7 studies (48%-56% of participants); 1/7 study reported 65% chose multiple activities, including cycling, swimming, and running. Barriers were identified in 5/7 studies, including symptom burden, cognitive impairment, treatment-related side effects, and psychological and external factors. Facilitators and motivators were reported in 3/7 studies and included support from carers and healthcare providers, structural enablers, and intrinsic motivations. Perceived benefits were identified in 5/7 studies, including improved physical function, energy, quality of life, well-being, self-efficacy, and social engagement.
conclusionsExercise interventions for adults with brain tumours should be flexible, individualised, and supported by carers and healthcare providers. Moderate aerobic training is preferred, while resistance training remains underexplored. Addressing barriers and providing structured support may enhance uptake and adherence. Further research is needed to establish optimal program characteristics across disease stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.