ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2026
Challenges in ophthalmic consultations and strategic communication.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore communication challenges in ophthalmic consultations from both patient and clinician perspectives, and to introduce 'Strategic Communication' as a structured, evidence-based approach aimed at enhancing patient-provider interactions and improving clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre mixed-method study involving online focus discussion groups and surveys. Eight ophthalmologists and eight patients recruited through the Italian national ophthalmic patient association participated in focus groups moderated by a health communication expert. These discussions explored communication challenges and potential solutions, based on participants' experience. Transcripts were thematically analysed by two independent researchers to identify key challenges and actionable insights. In parallel, quantitative data were collected via two structured questionnaires completed by 139 European ophthalmologists and 184 patients.
resultsKey themes included patients' limited understanding of their conditions, often influenced by misleading online information, and their strong preference for clear, empathetic communication. Clinicians reported that time constraints in public healthcare limited opportunities for meaningful dialogue, while the involvement of family members further complicated interactions. The 'Strategic Communication' framework, particularly the O.D.I. Method (Observe, Demand, Intervene), emerged as a structured framework for tailoring communication strategies to individual needs.
conclusion'Strategic Communication' offers a systematic, conceptual, theory-informed approach to address communication challenges in ophthalmology, with potential relevance for patient-centred care helping structured clinician-patient communication in ophthalmology. The present findings support its practical applicability. Future studies are needed to evaluate its impact on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.