ArticleBMJ open2026
Proactive anti-racism training for healthcare: study protocol for the development and evaluation of an Australian cognitive-behavioural therapy-informed racism reduction programme.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRacism in healthcare remains a barrier to health equity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia. This study protocol outlines the development and evaluation of a novel programme for racism reduction, drawing on aspects of cognitive behavioural therapy, motivational interviewing and the transtheoretical model of behaviour change. The project is led and governed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and responds to the lived experience of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people within the health system. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An interactive educational programme has been developed, with seven modules designed to move people from 'precontemplation' through to identifying unhelpful beliefs and moving towards healthy relationships with themselves and others. An iterative developmental evaluation methodology will enable adaptation and improvement of the programme over three phases of implementation. Phase 1 will involve programme refinement and development of in-person and eLearning modules, informed by qualitative interviews with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous staff and students, and a cross-sectional survey of racist attitudes and beliefs among non-Indigenous people. In phase 2, an initial pilot to assess acceptability and feasibility will be carried out both in person (n=20) and online (n=30). Following further refinement, phase 3 will involve a larger pilot study with health professionals (n=50) and university students (n=50). The evaluation will incorporate pre-programme and postprogramme surveys and per-module evaluations, alongside qualitative interviews at key points during the project. The experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander staff, patients and visitors will be monitored via an established patient experience measure (Yarn-Up Survey) already included in routine practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2024/HRE0057) and the Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia Aboriginal Health Research Ethics Committee (04-24-1130). Research dissemination will occur through presentations to stakeholders, academic journals and conference presentations. Refining the model at each phase will maximise its readiness for scalability across multiple health, medical education and potentially broader sectors in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.