ArticleBMJ open2026
Governance frameworks and decision-making models for intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntensive care units (ICUs) operate at the intersection of advanced technology, complex ethical decision-making and resource-intensive care. While many high-income countries have developed institutional governance mechanisms-such as Clinical Ethics Committees, structured triage policies and formal palliative care consultation pathways-to support ethical deliberation and accountability in ICUs, the applicability, structure and reported outcomes of such frameworks in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain unclear and dispersed across disciplines.
objectiveThis scoping review aims to map existing governance frameworks and ethical decision-making models guiding ICU practices globally, with particular attention to their relevance and reported application in LMIC contexts.
methodsThe review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) standards. Searches will be conducted across MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Global Health. Grey literature will be identified through Google Scholar, WHO Global Index Medicus and professional society websites (eg, Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), Indian Association of Palliative Care (IAPC) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)). Eligible sources will include empirical research, policy documents, guidelines and institutional reports published in English from 2000 onwards. Data will be charted using a structured template and synthesised through descriptive mapping and thematic analysis across domains, including structural design, decision processes, communication pathways, integration with palliative care, ethical-legal considerations and reported outcomes. The review is planned to be conducted between December 2025 and April 2026, including database searches, screening, data extraction and synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. OSF registration: https://osf.io/tkcav.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.