ArticleBMJ open2026
Lived experiences of cancer care for people living with HIV who are treated for anal cancer: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis scoping review aims to identify existing evidence on the lived experiences of people living with HIV and treated for anal cancer, and to identify what aspects of health and well-being are addressed in clinical guidance.
designA preregistered protocol (Open Science Framework, 2025) guided the review. We followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework, incorporating Levac DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches were performed across multiple databases, including CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase, using EBSCOhost and Ovid, supplemented handsearching reference lists. Two search strategies were used: one for research studies and one for clinical guidelines. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Sources included people living with HIV treated for anal cancer, capturing lived experiences directly through qualitative studies or indirectly via quantitative patient-reported outcomes and/or health-related quality of life. Guidelines addressing HIV or anal cancer were also included. DATA CHARTING AND SUMMARIES: Data were charted to capture patient experiences and outcomes on living with and beyond cancer, and how these are addressed in clinical management and guidance, including biomedical, psychosocial, sexual and functional aspects, and patient-reported outcomes.
resultsOf 945 records, three studies and four guidelines met criteria. No study focused exclusively on people living with HIV; findings reflect broader anal cancer populations with HIV-positive subsets. Studies addressed aspects of health-related quality of life which we mapped into physical, psychosocial and sexual domains. Clinical guidance prioritised treatment dosage and survival, with limited attention to broader effects. Stakeholders highlighted that existing research and guidance miss important nuances of lived experience and care needs.
conclusionsNo identified research solely explored the lived experiences of people living with HIV treated for anal cancer, leaving guidance non-specific and biomedical. The identified domains offer a starting point for future research; however, to inform patient-centred care, stakeholders emphasised the need to understand how living with HIV and anal cancer shapes health needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.