Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41916061›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Ultraviolet light preferences in a white and a brown layer pullet strain.

Malou van der Sluis, Jerine A J van der Eijk, Thea G C M van Niekerk, Marjaneh Taghavi, Dennis E Te Beest, Maaike Wolthuis-Fillerup, Henk Gunnink, Ingrid C de Jong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Malou van der SluisAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: malou.vandersluis@wur.nl.
Jerine A J van der EijkAnimal Health and Welfare, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Thea G C M van NiekerkAnimal Health and Welfare, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Marjaneh TaghaviAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Dennis E Te BeestBiometris, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Maaike Wolthuis-FillerupAnimal Health and Welfare, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Henk GunninkAnimal Health and Welfare, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Ingrid C de JongAnimal Health and Welfare, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate lighting in laying hen houses is of great importance for hens' health, welfare and performance. One light aspect that is present in the natural environment of chickens is ultraviolet (UV) light, and several studies have suggested that addition of UVA light might have positive effects on laying hens' welfare. In this study we investigated the preference of layer pullets of two breeds - Lohmann LSL Classic (white; W) and Lohmann Brown Classic (B) - for two levels of UVA light, and assessed 1) under which light condition (low UVA level (low-UV) versus a higher UVA level (high-UV) light) they spent most time and 2) what behaviors were performed in the different light conditions. A total of 132 W and 126 B birds were housed in pens (21-22 birds per pen) that were divided in two equal areas with the same light intensity (± 100 lux) but with different UVA levels (low-UV versus high-UV). Video recordings were made from above the pens and birds were automatically counted on each side using a computer vision detection algorithm. Behavior was observed at pen level using instantaneous scan sampling at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks of age. For the daytime period, it was observed that W birds had a preference for high-UV in the first three weeks of life, while no clear preferences were observed in B birds. In the last hour before lights off and the first hour of the dark period, B showed a preference for low-UV in week 2 and no clear preference at later ages, while W birds did not show a clear preference at the end of the day at any age. No differences between the low-UV and high-UV light condition were observed in the proportion of behaviors performed in each. These findings suggest that there might not be an exclusive preference for either low-UV or high-UV.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalChickensUltraviolet RaysAnimalsAnimal WelfareFemaleHousing, AnimalLightingBehaviorComputer visionPoultryUV lightWelfare

Identifiers

PMID41916061
PMCPMC13067110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.