ArticlePoultry science2026
Influence of synbiotic supplementation on performance, fecal consistency, cecal microbiome, and egg quality of hens during late laying phase.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hens in the late laying phase often experience age-related physiological constraints that may reduce production efficiency, eggshell quality, and welfare. This study evaluated the effects of dietary synbiotic supplementation on laying performance, egg quality, fecal characteristics, and the cecal microbiome of late-phase laying hens. A total of 240 Lohmann Brown hens (50 weeks old) were distributed into 20 replicates and randomly assigned to a corn-soybean control diet or the same diet supplemented with 100 mg/kg synbiotic (SYNLAC Prime®) for 22 weeks. Synbiotic supplementation did not affect egg production or egg mass but significantly reduced feed intake (P = 0.036). It also improved eggshell quality by decreasing the proportion of cracked eggs (P = 0.014) and increasing eggshell weight (P = 0.049) and shell thickness (P = 0.031). Fecal score and moisture content were not affected; however, synbiotic-fed hens showed lower fecal ammonia concentration (P = 0.033). Synbiotic supplementation increased both alpha and beta microbial diversity in the cecum. While microbial composition at higher taxonomic levels was largely unchanged, the relative abundances of Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae increased, whereas those of Bacteroidaceae and Clostridiaceae decreased. At the genus level, synbiotic supplementation increased Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, and Lactobacillus, while reducing Bacteroides and Alistipes. Functional prediction analysis indicated that synbiotic supplementation upregulated 12 cecal metabolic pathways and downregulated two pathways. Overall, synbiotic supplementation improved eggshell quality, promoted beneficial gut microbial populations, and reduced fecal ammonia emissions, suggesting its potential as a dietary strategy to support productivity and gut health in hens during the late laying phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.