Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915896›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026

Mental Health Apps Implemented in the Workplace: Scoping Review of Trends and Gaps in Evaluation Research.

Sheila Addanki, Luciana Macedo, Joy MacDermid, Sandra Moll

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sheila AddankiUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1239-0926
Luciana MacedoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada, 1 905-467-2155.ORCID 0000-0002-1840-2951
Joy MacDermidWestern University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9311-7379
Sandra MollSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada, 1 905-467-2155.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-0103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Technology-based solutions to support the mental health needs of workers are on the rise, as evidenced by the growing body of research related to e-mental health apps implemented with workers or within the context of workplaces. This expanding landscape of evidence related to mental health apps underscores the necessity of summarizing and consolidating the different ways in which studies are evaluating real-world technology-based interventions in a complex setting such as a workplace. Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to summarize the growing body of evidence evaluating mental health apps with workers. Specific research questions include "What types of mental health apps are studied?" "With whom are they being evaluated?" and "What outcomes are being tracked with what tools?" Methods: The scoping review followed 5 stages: specifying the research question, identifying relevant literature, selecting studies, extracting data, and synthesizing the findings. The search strategy was applied across 6 databases (PsycINFO, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, OVID Healthstar, and OVID Emcare) to identify relevant studies from January 2000 to August 2023. Results: From the 288 abstracts screened, 54 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Over two-thirds of the studies were randomized controlled trials. The studies included 44 different apps, comprising 23 structured self-guided apps, 15 unstructured self-guided apps, and 6 apps designed as adjuncts to other interventions. Evaluation approaches included examining user engagement and utilization, investigating the impact on users, and evaluating the implementation process. Most studies evaluated the impact on individual mental health-related outcomes as well as workplace-related outcomes. Conclusions: This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the ways in which studies are currently evaluating workplace mental health apps. The review highlights key trends and gaps in the existing research, noting that most studies focus on the effects of mental health apps on individual users, while only a limited number of studies explore how implementing such dynamic interventions within complex real-world settings (eg, workplaces) may influence their overall effectiveness. Future research should explore the implementation process to identify factors that promote and/or hinder the optimal use and impact of mental health apps for workers.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsWorkplaceEvidence GapsHumansMental Healthdigital healtheHealthmental health appsmHealthmobile appsmobile healthscoping reviewsmartphonestechnology-based interventionsuser engagementworkersworkplace

Identifiers

PMID41915896
PMCPMC13038184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.