ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Limitations of Cluster-Trained MLIPs for Liquid Density and Diffusivity.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) based on quantum-mechanical data are often used as a means to combine the performance of classical force-fields with the accuracy of electronic structure methods. In this work, MLIPs based on the MACE architecture were trained, starting from two publicly available data sets: one based on periodic structures, and the other based on molecular cluster data. Two rather challenging liquid properties are in focus, density and diffusivity, here for the battery-relevant ethylene carbonate and ethyl methyl carbonate solvents and mixtures thereof. The focus of our study is the uncertainties in the generated MLIP models themselves (calculated for committees of models with different regression seeds and different training set sizes) and how these uncertainties reflect on the MD-simulated target properties. The second focus point is whether these uncertainties are small enough to allow the comparison and assessment of different density functional theory (DFT) functionals; here, only a small number of them are compared, but the workflow opens up for a more extensive assessment of many DFT functionals. We find that all our MACE-MLIPs, both cluster-trained ones and the periodic-structure-trained ones, produce stable 1 ns NPT trajectories, regardless of training set size and cluster composition, but the MACE-MLIPs trained on cluster data (labeled with the hybrid ωB97X-D3 functional) are found to be sensitive to both the random training seed and the data selection, resulting in large uncertainties on the simulated diffusivity and density values.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.