ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Background selection in recombining genomes and its consequences for the maintenance of variation in complex traits.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evolution of quantitative traits with background selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Background selection in recombining genomes and its consequences for the maintenance of variation in complex traits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background selection (BGS)-the reduction of linked neutral diversity via the purging of deleterious mutations-is a pervasive force in genomic evolution. However, its impact on complex phenotypes remains poorly understood because classical theory treats fitness effects as fixed rather than emerging from a phenotype-to-fitness map. Here, we investigate the impact of BGS across three phenotypic selection frameworks: exponential directional, a liability threshold model, and stabilizing selection. First, we develop an effectively nonrecombining block approximation for the site frequency spectrum (SFS) and show that this framework accurately describes the skew in the SFS in the weak mutation regime typical of humans. Second, we show that phenotypic impacts of BGS depend on how selection is coupled across loci. In the liability threshold model, strong synergistic epistasis generates a global compensation mechanism-driven by tiny shifts in the mean phenotype-that propagates BGS effects to strongly selected variants otherwise immune to linked selection. This coupling reduces genetic variance across almost the entire effect-size distribution by an amount determined by a nonlinear average of local effective population size reductions across the genome. Conversely, under stabilizing selection, BGS can counterintuitively increase genetic variance. This occurs because BGS shifts strongly selected sites into the weakly selected underdominant regime where they persist at intermediate frequencies longer than in the equivalent directional selection model. Our results inform both longstanding evolutionary conversations regarding synergistic epistasis and efforts to model the impact of background selection on individual variants in recombining genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.