ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Non-ergodicity in ecology and evolution.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-ergodicity in ecology and evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stochasticity plays an important role in all biological systems. The standard way to deal with stochasticity involves averaging over an ensemble of independent realizations. However, such mean statistics need not accurately reflect the typical outcomes in any finite sample unless the system satisfies the property of ergodicity, which guarantees that each trajectory will over time experience the same statistics as the entire ensemble. Here, we argue that, in contrast, non-ergodicity might instead be the rule rather than exception in real biological systems and investigate its implications for eco-evolutionary dynamics through three case-studies. First, we show how demographic stochasticity leads to ergodicity breaking where the asymptotic growth rate carries a signature of the initial condition. This motivates us to define a mutant establishment threshold, which quantifies a critical population size above which the typical mutant population starts to grow. Second, we consider environmental stochasticity and demonstrate that eco-evolutionary feedback can lead to non-ergodic dynamics, which has the important consequence that the fitness of a genotype cannot be simply averaged over the environments. Finally, we show how in a metapopulation structure the evolutionary dynamics within a typical subpopulation can deviate from the ensemble dynamics in the entire metapopulation, which is sufficient to explain the evolution and persistence of cooperation despite a fitness cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.