ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Characterization of EOP-1 reveals cell autonomous oscillations preceding somatic cell fusion in Neurospora crassa.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell fusion is a fundamental process essential for the development and proliferation of eukaryotic organisms. In the ascomycete fungus Neurospora crassa, germinating spores undergo chemotropic interactions and fusion to merge into a supracellular unit, which gives rise to the mycelial colony. Within mature colonies, hyphal branches fuse to form anastomoses between leading hyphae, enhancing the overall connectivity of the mycelium. Both germling and hyphal fusion rely on the same molecular machinery. The MAP kinase MAK-2 and the fungal-specific protein SO have been identified as key regulators of these processes, and their alternating recruitment to the plasma membrane at interacting cell tips suggests a dialog-like cell communication mechanism involving dynamic switches between signal sending and receiving. However, the mechanisms that trigger the onset of this intercellular communication are still not understood. This study identifies EOP-1 as an interaction partner of the SO protein and functionally characterizes its role in cell communication and fusion. Deletion of the eop-1 gene abolished germling fusion and chemotropic interactions, while live-cell imaging showed EOP-1 oscillating at interacting cell tips, coinciding with SO recruitment. Intriguingly, EOP-1 displayed a similar dynamic, oscillatory tip recruitment also in isolated, non-interacting germlings, setting it apart from previously characterized fusion factors in N. crassa. This observation suggests for the first time that spore germlings of N. crassa exhibit fusion related cell-autonomous oscillatory behavior and implicates EOP-1 in initiating intercellular communication. The oscillatory recruitment pattern of EOP-1 was dependent on the presence of SO, MAK-1, MAK-2, BEM1 and HAM-14 in the cell. Loss of EOP-1 strongly reduced MAK-1 phosphorylation, placing EOP-1 upstream of MAK-1 pathway activation. This work offers new insight into how genetically and developmentally identical cells initiate and coordinate their communication and mutual attraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.