ArticlePloS one2026
Power and influence in world-level sport coaching: A Foucauldian and Raven-informed interpretive vignette study in underwater rugby.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined how world-level underwater rugby coaches mobilise interpersonal power to shape athletes' behaviour, cohesion and self-regulation under high-pressure, low-verbal conditions. Anchored in Foucauldian accounts of power/knowledge and Raven's interpersonal power bases, we examined how trust, expertise and authority were narrated within an embodied coaching ecology. An interpretive qualitative vignette design with a hermeneutic sensibility was employed with three world-champion coaches (aged 42-44; ≥ 12 years' international experience). Data were generated via an online questionnaire comprising ten high stakes coaching scenarios. For each vignette, participants selected the single response option that best approximated their likely first-line action (mapped at design time to French and Raven's power bases, including informational power) and provided a brief open-text rationale. Analysis combined a deliberately modest descriptive use of the closed selections with reflexive thematic analysis of the written rationales, treating the taxonomy as a sensitising framework at interpretation. Three themes captured coaches' influence work: relational anchoring under aquatic risk; expertise as embodied pedagogy, in which brief reasons were folded into demonstration; and boundary-setting governance, in which formal authority was framed as selective and proportionate. The contribution is not a general revision of power theory, but a context-specific refinement. In low-verbal aquatic settings, influence was narrated as a compressed choreography in which referent trust opens receptivity to expert demonstration, informational reasoning is nested within expert guidance, and formal authority operates mainly as a bounded safety and standards resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.