ArticlePloS one2026
Comprehensive protocol for mixed reality visualization and navigation using 3D Slicer.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in mixed reality (MxR) technology have significantly enhanced neurosurgical navigation by improving visualization, spatial accuracy, and surgical outcomes. MxR navigation (MRN) provides a cost-effective and intuitive alternative to conventional navigation systems, enabling stable spatial mapping and independent navigation. Despite this potential, implementing MRN is complex, creating a need for structured workflows and rigorous accuracy assessments. To address this gap, this protocol presents a structured, modular, and reproducible lab protocol based on the open-source platform 3D Slicer, enabling effective implementation and evaluation of developed MRN systems in neurosurgical contexts. This protocol clearly defines sequential steps, required inputs, and expected outputs for both visualization-oriented and navigation-oriented workflows. It encompasses preprocessing (anonymization, quality checks, multimodal image fusion), semi-automatic segmentation of anatomical structures (e.g., lesions, vessels, fiber tracts), and the generation of precise 3D surface models (STL or OBJ formats). For navigation scenarios, the protocol includes parameterization of fiducial landmarks, anatomical surfaces, and laser projections for precise virtual-to-physical registration. Accuracy and performance validation are rigorously assessed using virtual and physical static digital twins, generating quantitative displacement analyses and intuitive visualizations directly interpretable in clinical and research environments. The modular design and exclusive reliance on open-source software ensure reproducibility, flexibility, and broad interdisciplinary accessibility, benefiting users from diverse backgrounds with basic knowledge in anatomy, neurosurgery, and computer graphics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.