Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915590›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2026

Applying Both Landscape Genomic and Ecological Niche Model Predictions to Inform Conservation Strategies of a California Foundational Oak Species.

Ryan C Buck, H Scott Butterfield, Elizabeth H T Hiroyasu, Jeanette Howard, Zachary Principe, M Brooke Rose, Victoria L Sork

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Landscape Genomic Analyses ofEvolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan C BuckDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9905-5789
H Scott ButterfieldThe Nature Conservancy, California Chapter, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4922-2432
Elizabeth H T HiroyasuThe Nature Conservancy, California Chapter, Sacramento, California, USA.
Jeanette HowardThe Nature Conservancy, California Chapter, Sacramento, California, USA.
Zachary PrincipeThe Nature Conservancy, California Chapter, Sacramento, California, USA.
M Brooke RoseCenter for Open Geographical Sciences, Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5269-3759
Victoria L SorkDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2677-1420

Funding

Acquisition of Covaris E220 and Sciclone G3 systems for high throughput sequencinS10OD010786 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI COMAI, LUCA · 2012 to 2012
$311k
Nature ConservancyNIH HHS S10 OD010786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental factors shape the distributions of organisms and their underlying patterns of genetic variation. When climate changes rapidly, organisms that are adapted to current environments may become maladapted to future climates. Long-lived tree species are especially susceptible to climate maladaptation due to their sessile nature and long generation times. Understanding how foundational tree species will respond to future climate, both in adaptive ability and distribution shifts, is imperative for effective management and conservation of tree populations and the ecosystems they comprise. Here, we used whole genome sequences from 163 individuals of blue oak (Quercus douglasii) to determine predicted adaptedness, the degree to which an organism can survive and reproduce in future climate, based on landscape genomic models, compare those genomic predictions with ecological niche model predictions, and propose seed sourcing and restoration site strategies to increase the adaptedness of stands at preserves managed by The Nature Conservancy. Both ecological and genomic models predict that blue oak stands will be more susceptible to future climate along the Sierra Nevada basin, with patches of higher climate adaptedness along the central coast of California. To test whether management practices could increase adaptedness of blue oak stands, we examined the impact of seed source and restoration site choice on future stands. Regardless of restoration site category, our expectation held true that future maladaptation risk is reduced the most when using seed sources preadapted to the future climate of the restoration site. However, restoration sites containing stands with high habitat suitability and high climate adaptedness always did best. We conclude that strategic conservation and management strategies utilizing seed transfer from climate-adapted stands may improve the future health of blue oak stands susceptible to future climate.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemQuercusAdaptation, PhysiologicalCaliforniaClimate ChangeGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenomicsModels, GeneticSeedsTreesadaptednessblue oakclimate changeconservation managementecological niche modellingfoundation specieslandscape genomicsseed sourcing

Identifiers

PMID41915590
PMCPMC13037804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.