ArticleIEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Incorporating Patient Similarity and Clinical Temporality in Disease Prognostic Modeling.
Article in IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health recommender systems (HRSs) enhance prognostication by leveraging clinical information. Existing HRSs often fail to capture the intrinsic correlations between patient phenotypes with similar clinical profiles, necessitating approaches that incorporate patient similarity into prognostic modeling. This work explores such correlations within three classes of biomedical information: diagnosis, procedure, and medication, and the clinical temporality during patient visits to improve diagnostic accuracy. Our approaches include both static and dynamic scenarios. In the static scenario, we propose SIM-PR, which integrates patient similarity and PageRank centrality on a personalized patient graph, and can operate with or without sequential hospital visit information. In the dynamic setting, we develop temporal prediction models based on a multilayer perceptron and a long short-term memory network to learn evolving diagnostic patterns from longitudinal visit histories. Standard supervised machine learning, including logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machines, is employed as comparative baselines. Experiments on the MIMIC-III database demonstrate that the proposed static and temporal models effectively reduce false positives and negatives and achieve superior predictive accuracy compared to existing HRS approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.