ArticleEpilepsia open2026
Expanding the scope of pediatric epilepsy surgery: Access, indications, and outcomes in a modern cohort.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expanding the scope of pediatric epilepsy surgery: Access, indications, and outcomes in a modern cohort.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveExpanded indications, diagnostic tools, and treatment options have transformed the landscape of modern pediatric epilepsy surgery. Published real-world experiences from large surgical cohorts are still needed. To close this gap, we evaluated access, indications, treatment, and outcomes in a contemporary pediatric epilepsy surgery program.
methodsWe evaluated data from 100 consecutive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in 62 pediatric and young adult patients. Data collected included demographics, diagnostics, procedures, 12-month seizure and medication outcomes, and adverse events. Primary outcome for patients who underwent treatment with the goal of cure or resection, along with the intent of palliation, was 12-month postoperative Engel/ILAE scores. For those who underwent RNS-implant (alone or in combination with a second procedure) with the goal of seizure reduction, the primary outcome was proportion seizure reduction in the prior 28 days at 12 months postoperatively.
resultsPatients largely matched state and regional demographics. Epilepsy types included unifocal (n = 33, 53.2%), multifocal (n = 15, 24.2%), generalized (n = 12, 19.4%), and combined (n = 2, 3.2%). Of the 100 procedures, 36.0% were diagnostic SEEG (n = 35) and 64.0% were treatment procedures (n = 58; note: n = 4 pending). Among patients who underwent surgical treatment with the goal of cure (n = 33), a 12-month Engel I/ILAE I or III outcome was achieved in 81.8% (n = 27). Among patients who underwent RNS implantation, 79.0% were responders (>50% reduction) and 38.0% were super-responders (>90% reduction), with a median seizure reduction of 78% at 12 months. Three treatment procedures (4.7%, n = 3 patients) had a surgical complication, none permanent. SIGNIFICANCE: Contemporary pediatric epilepsy surgery, utilizing modern diagnostic and surgical techniques, including off-label use of RNS, provides safe, effective, accessible, and equitable treatment to children across a broad range of indications, many of whom, historically, have not been considered viable surgical candidates. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: "In this article by McLaren et al, 100 consecutive procedures were examined from a modern pediatric epilepsy surgery program. By utilizing advanced diagnostic and surgical techniques, they've shown that pediatric epilepsy surgery can be safe, effective, and accessible across diverse conditions and demographics. Notably, 82% of patients who underwent surgery aimed at curing their condition achieved seizure-freedom in 12 months and 79% of patients with Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) implants experienced significant seizure reduction."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.