Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915420›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026

Analysis Model for Infant Incubator Adverse Events Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation Combined With Dual-Adapter Fine-Tuning: Development and Evaluation Study.

Wenke Xia, Wanting Zhu, Tianchun Li, Li Wang, Weiqi Li, Peiming Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenke XiaSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0009-6286-0595
Wanting ZhuSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0004-2696-3873
Tianchun LiSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0002-0354-2756
Li WangCenter for Drug Reevaluation of Henan, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0002-6588-6917
Weiqi LiSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0005-2537-8784
Peiming ZhangSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0003-2409-5323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfant incubator adverse events refer to various harmful incidents that occur during the normal use of marketed infant incubators and result in, or may result in, bodily harm. In recent years, however, the number of reported adverse events has continued to rise. This trend has made the monitoring of infant incubator adverse events time-consuming and labor-intensive when relying solely on manual processing by medical device adverse-event monitoring personnel. Meanwhile, general-purpose large language models (LLMs) still face domain knowledge gaps and hallucination issues in specialized fields. Through fine-tuning, LLMs can be adapted to specific application scenarios, while retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances their ability to handle knowledge-intensive tasks. Therefore, LLMs that integrate these 2 technologies hold significant potential for addressing monitoring challenges.

objectiveThis study aims to enhance the intelligent monitoring of adverse events related to medical devices by integrating RAG with dual-adapter fine-tuning to construct an adverse-event analysis model for infant incubators. The model enables an integrated workflow centered on extraction and analysis, encompassing structured extraction of adverse events, narrative analysis, and regulatory question answering.

methodsThis study leveraged adverse-event data from Chinese infant incubators to construct a high-quality dataset through prompt engineering. Technologically, it combined 2 parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods-low-rank adaptation and infused adapter by inhibiting and amplifying inner activations-to achieve efficient adaptation on the Qwen2-7B base model. Simultaneously, it introduced the FINBGE embedding model with supervised contrastive semantic optimization to build a knowledge retrieval system that mitigates hallucination.

resultsThis study comprises 1565 pediatric disease question-and-answer entries from PediaBench, 2530 specific corpora on adverse events in infant incubators, and 1488 regulatory corpora. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of this analytical model across various metrics. Under the same experimental conditions, the element recall rate reaches 0.815, the accuracy of infant incubator adverse event analysis is 0.898, and the accuracy in regulatory clause question-answering tasks attains 0.938.

conclusionsThe analytical model proposed in this study demonstrates significant advantages in analyzing adverse events related to infant incubators, while also achieving substantial improvements in text generation metrics. When combined with RAG, it not only effectively mitigates hallucination but also enhances knowledge timeliness. This study employs the Qwen model as its foundational framework, leveraging large-model fine-tuning and RAG to achieve intelligent analysis of high-risk medical device adverse-event monitoring data. It demonstrates the feasibility of implementing intelligent medical device regulation within the Qwen ecosystem.

Indexed as

Incubators, InfantHumansInfantInfant, Newbornadverse events in medical devicesfine-tuning techniquesinfant incubatorslarge language modelsretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID41915420
PMCPMC13080295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.