ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2026
Molecular Engineering of the Helminth TGF-β Mimetics, TGM1 and TGM4, Reveals a Novel Antagonist of TGF-β Signaling in Fibroblasts.
Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) mimics TGM1 and TGM4 are modular proteins expressed by the parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Each comprises 5 complement control protein (CCP) domains binding the TGF-β receptors TGFBR1 (Domains 1 and 2) and TGFBR2 (Domain 3), whereas Domains 4 and 5 bind cell surface co-receptors including CD44. Despite sharing 86% amino acid identity, TGM1 and TGM4 differ functionally in key respects of affinity for mammalian TGFBRs and interactions with cell surface co-receptors. Although both induce T cell expression of the transcription factor Foxp3, TGM1 activates intracellular SMAD signaling in fibroblasts, whereas conversely, TGM4 blocks SMAD responses to TGF-β or TGM1 in fibroblasts. By recombining and/or deleting domains, we identified that the TGFBR1-binding Domains 1 and 2 of TGM4 confer antagonist activity, which is dependent on the CD44 co-receptor interacting domains (Domains 4 and 5); antagonism is enhanced but not fully dependent on binding to TGFBR2. TGMs lack interchain disulfide bonds, in distinction to TGF-β, which is a covalently linked dimeric cytokine. Dimerization of TGM4 as an Fc fusion protein converted it from an inhibitor to an activator of SMAD signaling in fibroblasts and enhanced Foxp3 induction, indicating that high avidity interactions (either monomer/dimer on T cells or only dimer on fibroblasts) drive TGF-β signaling. However, when TGM4 is below an avidity threshold, it binds receptors in an antagonistic mode. These results advance our understanding of the mechanism of action of these parasite-encoded products and uncover new tools modulating TGF-β functions in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.