SynthesisClinical rheumatology2026
Plasma exchange in adult idiopathic inflammatory myositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of plasma exchange (PE) in adult patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).
methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched from inception to 17 January 2025. Studies involving adult patients with IIM treated with PE were included. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes and adverse events were extracted.
resultsThirty-five studies involving 473 patients were included, of whom 361 received PE. Most studies were observational, and PE was predominantly used as adjunctive or rescue therapy alongside immunosuppressive treatment. Across included studies, PE was reported to be associated with improvements in organ-specific outcomes, including muscle strength, dysphagia, pulmonary manifestations and biochemical markers such as creatine kinase, ferritin, KL-6 and myositis-specific autoantibody titres. A meta-analysis of seven comparative studies did not demonstrate a statistically significant mortality benefit associated with PE in patients with refractory or rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16-1.06, I
conclusionPE has a biologically plausible but clinically selective role in adult IIM and is most commonly used as an adjunctive therapy in severe or refractory disease. Evidence is heterogeneous and largely observational, limiting causal inference. Prospective studies with standardised outcome measures are required to better define the role of PE in IIM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.