ArticleHealth & justice2026
Arrest discretion and training needs for interacting with people with substance use disorders: a qualitative secondary analysis among police recruits in Washington State.
Article in Health & justice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFrequent interactions between law enforcement and individuals with substance use disorders carry significant public health implications. Pre-arrest diversion programs rely on officer discretion to redirect individuals toward a range of medical and social services rather than make an arrest. To inform more effective evidence-based training, this study examines how police recruits anticipate exercising this discretion and identifies their self-reported training needs for navigating encounters with this population.
resultsA qualitative thematic analysis of open-ended survey responses from 115 recruits at the Washington State Basic Law Enforcement Academy was guided by the Focal Concerns Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior. Four themes emerged: (1) divergent views on addiction as a matter of personal choice versus disease, influencing perceptions of blameworthiness; (2) a primary concern for community protection, shaped by distinctions between violent and non-violent offenses; (3) a belief that incarceration can be a practical pathway to rehabilitation; and (4) a tension between adhering to departmental policy and being guided by personal and professional experiences. For future training, recruits requested more practical knowledge on drugs and de-escalation and strongly recommended experiential learning, including interactions with people with lived experience.
conclusionsRecruits’ anticipated use of discretion is shaped by core beliefs, practical considerations, and personal history. Training must move beyond knowledge transfer to actively address underlying attitudes and heuristics influencing arrest decisions. Effective implementation will also require aligning this training with supportive departmental policies and leadership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.