ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Comparative changes in serum and CSF levels of CRP and Caspase-3 with keyhole clipping and endovascular coiling for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to traditional clipping and coiling, the keyhole approach provides a third alternative for ruptured aneurysms, promising minimal invasiveness with surgical cure. While biochemical markers of inflammation & apoptosis play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of SAH, the impact of the intervention modality on their levels has not been fully evaluated. This is probably the first study to assess peri-treatment changes in levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP), an inflammatory biomarker & Caspase-3, an indicator of apoptosis, between patients undergoing keyhole clipping and endovascular coiling, with pterional clipping as the control. Patients with select uncomplicated ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms, admitted within 72 h of ictus, in World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grades 1–3, were included. Giant aneurysms (> 2.5 cm) and those with midline shift (> 5 mm) were excluded. CRP & Caspase-3 levels were evaluated at admission and after the definitive treatment in serum and CSF. DCI was assessed within 10 days of ictus, while WHOQOL-BREF was evaluated at 3 months. The study included 41 patients who underwent coiling, 38 patients who underwent the supraorbital keyhole approach, and 174 patients who underwent traditional clipping, serving as controls. Important baseline parameters were comparable across the groups. The median peri-treatment percent increase in serum CRP was 248%, 377%, and 416%, while median CSF CRP levels increased by 0.51, 0.53, and 0.65 mg/L among endovascular coiling, keyhole clipping, and traditional clipping groups, respectively. CSF levels of Caspase-3 increased 12% and 55% after keyhole and coiling, respectively. DCI was noted in 32%, 44%, and 43%, while refractory vasospasm was seen in 5.3%, 9.8%, and 14.9% in the keyhole, coiling, and pterional treatment arms, respectively. These were not, however, statistically significant. Subgroup analysis indicated a higher risk of DCI in coiling than keyhole, especially in mFisher 4 (79% vs. 39%, p = 0.03) and WFNS grade 3 (78% vs. 0%, p = 0.05). The median QOL scores were similar in the keyhole (67.17) and coiling (65.89) groups, whereas they were marginally lower in the pterional (64.71) group. The increasing trend of both serum and CSF CRP levels (from before to after-treatment) was the lowest with coiling, moderate with keyhole, and the highest with pterional clipping, apparently suggesting an intermediate inflammatory footprint by keyhole clipping, while CSF Caspase-3 levels, indicative of apoptosis, increased somewhat more with coiling than keyhole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41915235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.