Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915180›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026

Allogeneic CD56 + cell infusion as a bridge to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a phase I clinical trial.

Amin Shahbaz Ghasabeh, Amirhossein Izadpanah, Mehdi Bakhtiyaridovvombaygi, Mehrshad Seresht-Ahmadi, Sahar Parkhideh, Hamide Rahmani Seraji, Abdollah Sabri, Somayeh Yazdanparast, Abbas Hajifathali, Ahmad Gharehbaghian and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amin Shahbaz GhasabehLaboratory Hematology and Blood Bank Department, School of Allied Medical Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein IzadpanahHematopoietic Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi BakhtiyaridovvombaygiHematopoietic Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehrshad Seresht-AhmadiHematopoietic Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sahar ParkhidehHematopoietic Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamide Rahmani SerajiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abdollah SabriHematopoietic Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Somayeh YazdanparastDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Abbas HajifathaliHematopoietic Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. hajifathali@yahoo.com.
Ahmad GharehbaghianLaboratory Hematology and Blood Bank Department, School of Allied Medical Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran. gharehbaghian@hotmail.com.
Elham RoshandelHematopoietic Stem Cell Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. elham.roshandel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3698-4342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive disease with suboptimal overall survival, especially in relapsed/refractory patients. The primary goal of salvage therapy in this patient is to achieve optimal disease control, thereby allowing the transition to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which remains the only curative option for a subset of these patients. Allogeneic KIR ligand-mismatched CD56 STUDY

designRelapsed/refractory non-M3 AML patients who were not HSCT candidates were included in this phase I clinical trial. Patients received the FLAG conditioning regimen followed by three escalating doses (1 × 10⁶, 3 × 10⁶, 5 × 10⁶ cells/kg) of CD56

resultsA total of 11 patients with a median age of 41.5 years were enrolled in the study. On average, they received three lines of prior chemotherapy and showed 18% blasts in their bone marrow. The infusion of CD56⁺ NK/NKT-like cells was safe, with no serious toxicity or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) observed in any patient. Following this treatment protocol, five patients (45.4%) achieved complete remission (CR), with or without hematologic count recovery. Four of these patients (36.3%) underwent successful HSCT and remained event-free to the end of the follow-up period.

conclusionOverall, these trials indicated that the FLAG regimen chemotherapy combined with allogeneic KIR ligand-mismatched CD56

Indexed as

CD56 AntigenHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationKiller Cells, NaturalLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdultBridge TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceSalvage TherapyTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HomologousYoung AdultCD56 AntigenNCAM1 protein, humanAcute myeloid leukemiaCD56+ cellsHematopoietic stem cell transplantationNatural killer cellsRelapsed/refractory

Identifiers

PMID41915180
PMCPMC13038840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.