Observational studyNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Opposing effects of efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab on serum albumin levels in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis.
Observational study in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- B Cells and B Cell Depletion in Autoimmunity and Atherosclerosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab are both neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors for generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), they possess distinct molecular structures: efgartigimod is an engineered immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) Fc fragment, whereas rozanolixizumab is an IgG4 monoclonal antibody. This study aimed to investigate whether these distinct molecular structures induce differential effects on serum albumin in a real-world setting. We conducted a single-center observational study in patients with generalized MG who newly initiated efgartigimod or rozanolixizumab, measuring serum IgG and albumin levels at baseline and the end of the first treatment cycle. We analyzed 21 treatment cycles (efgartigimod, n = 16; rozanolixizumab, n = 5) from 20 patients, including one who received both therapies. Both drugs induced comparable reductions in serum IgG (median: efgartigimod 671.5 mg/dL vs. rozanolixizumab 734.0 mg/dL, p = 0.59). In contrast, their effects on serum albumin levels were diametrically opposed. In the efgartigimod group, albumin levels increased in 15 (94%) cases (median: + 0.45 g/dL), whereas in the rozanolixizumab group, levels decreased in 5 (100%) cases (median: - 0.40 g/dL). The between-group difference in median albumin change was substantial (p = 0.001). Efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab exert opposing effects on serum albumin levels despite similar IgG-lowering efficacy. This modality-specific pattern suggests distinct pharmacological interactions with the FcRn-albumin recycling pathway, potentially influencing treatment selection in specific patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.