Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915157›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026

The

Mark Estabrook, Christina Streit, Andrew Townsend, Gregory Stone, Shweta Kamat, Daniel Sahm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark EstabrookIHMA, Schaumburg, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-3941-6589
Christina StreitIHMA, Schaumburg, Illinois, USA.
Andrew TownsendPfizer Inc, Tadworth, United Kingdom.
Gregory StonePfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Shweta KamatPfizer PIPL, Mumbai, India.
Daniel SahmIHMA, Schaumburg, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NG-test CARBA 5 and Xpert Carba-R IVD kits were tested against 269 clinical Enterobacterales isolates selected for their previously determined carbapenemase content from the ATLAS Global Surveillance program, primarily from 2020 to 2022. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by broth microdilution was performed for aztreonam-avibactam, cefiderocol, and othe agents using EUCAST 2025 breakpoints for interpretation. The CARBA 5 and Carba-R IVD kits accurately identified all NDM (93), KPC (36), and OXA-48-like (43) carbapenemases. The CARBA 5 detected all IMP (42) and 45/47 VIM, and the Carba-R detected all VIM (47) and 21/42 IMP. Aztreonam-avibactam was active against carbapenemase-producing isolates (percent susceptible [carbapenemases]): 90.7% (NDM), 92.9% (NDM+OXA-48-like), 100% (IMP, VIM, and KPC), and 88.9% (OXA-48-like). Cefiderocol susceptibility was as follows: 38.7% (NDM), 50.0% (NDM+OXA-48-like), 77.5% (IMP), 82.5% (VIM), 75.9% (KPC), and 100% (OXA-48-like). The most common carbapenemases in Enterobacterales include NDM, KPC, and OXA-48-like enzymes, all of which were accurately identified by the CARBA 5 and Carba-R kits. Aztreonam-avibactam demonstrated potent

Indexed as

aztreonam-avibactamCarba 5carbapenemasecarbapenem-resistant EnterobacteralesCarba-RcefiderocolIVDmetallo-beta-lactamase

Identifiers

PMID41915157
PMCPMC13141907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.