Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915156›Full record

ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2026

[Peripheral regional anesthesia and analgesia: "the magnificent seven" for training].

M H Huppertz-Thyssen, A H Andres, T Komanek, N Nikolić, T Volk, A U Steinbicker, U H Frey, T P Weber

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M H Huppertz-ThyssenKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Akutschmerztherapie, St. Augustinus Krankenhaus Düren, JG Rur-Kliniken, Renkerstr. 45, 52355, Düren, Deutschland. markus.huppertz@jg-gruppe.de.
A H AndresKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivtherapie und Notfallmedizin, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Voedestr. 79, 44866, Bochum, Deutschland.
T KomanekKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, St. Anna Hospital, Hospitalstr. 19, 44649, Herne, Deutschland.
N NikolićKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
T VolkUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv‑, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str. 100, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.
A U SteinbickerMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
U H FreyKlinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin, Schmerz- und Palliativmedizin, Marien Hospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Deutschland.
T P WeberKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivtherapie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances in ultrasound imaging have expanded the access routes for nerve and fascia blocks, opening up new perspectives. This has led to a significant increase in the number of published block techniques in regional anesthesia. Which specific regional anesthesiology techniques should be taught is currently not defined, even though the focus of the new postgraduate training regulations prior to admission to the anesthesia board examination now focuses on the acquisition of practical skills and ability to act rather than defined training time and numbers. The aim of this article is to propose frequent and established techniques for postgraduate training. The foundations for the recommendations were the establishment of interfascial blocks and the necessity of "motor sparing", which is increasingly considered to be an integral part of modern regional anesthesia concepts. These techniques are characterized by their ease of learning and an optimal risk-benefit profile. Proposals for regional anesthesia procedures in individual body regions are presented. A total of seven regional anesthesia procedures are proposed: axillary brachial plexus block (BPB), distal sciatic nerve block (DIB), interscalene BPB, femoral nerve block (NFB) together with the motor-sparing femoral triangle block (TFB), pericapsular nerve group block (PENG), transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) with its variations and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB).

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiologyEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansNerve BlockUltrasonography, InterventionalAnatomical areasBasic blocksCurriculumFurther education conceptUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID41915156
PMCPMC13226434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.