Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915134›Full record

ArticleChemMedChem2026

Snake Venom Protease Detection and Inhibition in Serum.

Mareike Riedel, Christian Kersten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemMedChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mareike RiedelInstitute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1116-8293
Christian KerstenInstitute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Science, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9976-7639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snake bites remain major threats with only limited diagnostic and therapeutic options. Current antibody-based antivenoms show only limited effectiveness against local tissue damage and require complex manufacturing and cold chain logistics. To overcome these limitations, a fluorescence-based assay was established to enable the sensitive detection of snake venom metalloprotease (SVMP) and serine protease (SVSP) activities in crude viper venoms from Crotalus atrox, Bothrops jararaca, and Echis carinatus. The assays showed species-specific activity profiles with detection limits in the sub-microgram per 45 and 100 µL range for SVSP and SVMP, respectively. Notably, protease activity in bovine and human blood sera, with only a slight loss of sensitivity compared to isolated venom in buffer, can be measured. Inhibitory effects of small molecule protease inhibitors, batimastat, marimastat, ilomastat, nafamostat, and leupeptin, were determined, showing strong SVMP or SVSP inhibition, respectively. Based on this proof-of-concept, the combination of such activity-based assays with selective small-molecule inhibitors could open new opportunities for rapid venom detection in diagnosis and complementary therapy, particularly in resource-poor settings.

Indexed as

MetalloproteasesProtease InhibitorsSerine ProteasesSnake VenomsViper VenomsAnimalsBothrops atroxCattleEchisHumansMetalloproteasesProtease InhibitorsSerine ProteasesSnake VenomsViper Venomsenvenoming diagnosticsfluorescence‐based assaymetalloproteasesserine proteasessmall molecule inhibitorssnake venom proteasesviper venom

Identifiers

PMID41915134
PMCPMC13037691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.