ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
The Brazilian Version of the Mystical Orientation Scale Revised (MOSR-BR): An Exploratory Study.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mystical experiences are commonly described in the context of psychedelic use and other forms of expanded states of consciousness. Although the Mystical Orientation Scale Revised (MOSR) has been used in international studies, no Brazilian Portuguese version had been tested to date. This exploratory study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and examine the psychometric properties of the MOSR for the Brazilian population (MOSR-BR). The process followed international guidelines, including translation, back-translation, expert committee review, and pre-testing. The final version was applied to a sample of 505 Brazilian adults. Exploratory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure, explaining 47.6% of the variance. The MOSR-BR showed high internal consistency (α = .95), slightly higher than the original and Italian versions. Construct validity was evidenced by significant positive correlations between MOSR-BR and all subscales of the Death Transcendence Scale, as well as with the Religious and Existential Well-Being subscales of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale. The scale also discriminated between psychedelic substance users and non-users, with higher mystical orientation scores among occasional and frequent users. This exploratory study provides preliminary evidence supporting the value of further research on the MOSR-BR to address acknowledged limitations with the pilot study, including the cross-sectional design, non-causal inferences, recruitment method and participant self-selection, limited generalizability, absence of confirmatory factor analysis and test-retest reliability, and the need for larger and more diverse samples with longitudinal reliability assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.