Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915076›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

The farther, the earlier: perceived depth biases temporal order judgments.

Binglong Li, Jiehui Qian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Binglong LiDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Jiehui QianDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. qianjh3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal order perception is essential for understanding the succession of events, and is suggested to be affected by attention or metaphorical space-time mapping. Attention theories predict that near or large objects capture attention and enter into consciousness earlier, while the metaphor hypothesis links the concepts of 'far' and 'past' in many languages, predicting that far objects is perceived as appearing earlier. This study investigated temporal order perception in three-dimensional (3D) space to clarify its underlying mechanism. Across three experiments, participants performed a temporal order judgment task, reporting which of two objects appeared first. Using binocular disparity (Experiment 1) and pictorial depth cues (gradient background and relative size, Experiment 2), we observed a consistent bias: distant and smaller objects were perceived as appearing earlier. Experiment 3 manipulated the congruency of depth cues (disparity and relative size), and the bias was reduced under incongruent conditions, indicating a joint effect of integrating depth information during temporal order perception. These findings reveal a systematic temporal bias in 3D space that challenges attentional accounts and aligns with the linguistic metaphor hypothesis, suggesting that perception is biased by prior knowledge through space-time metaphoric mapping.

Indexed as

AttentionDepth PerceptionJudgmentTime PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultdepth perceptionspace-timetemporal ordertemporal perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.